7.30.2012

3:50 Minutes Too Long

Here's a quiz. What type of scan resolve content is associated with the QR Code found in the print advertisement shown below?

A) Home page of corporate website.
B) Product page on corporate website.
C) Video clip.
D) Mobile-optimized landing page, which supports the QR Code's call-to-action, and delivers value and benefit to the consumer.

The correct answer is C. Surprised? Don't be. Many QR Codes lead to videos, which is fine, when they are done correctly. So, the next question can be asked, was this one done correctly? Not entirely. Let's take a closer look.


For starters, the animated video, while clean and well designed, is 3:50 minutes in length. 3:50 minutes is quite a long time for someone to stop what they are doing (remember the reader of the advertisement is interacting via a smartphone) and view the entire video to the very end. In this scenario, as in most, a shorter run time should boost viewership and response.

But even if the video ran shorter, the real hang up I have is that, at the end of the video, the reader of the advertisement is left right back where they started, on You Tube with more videos to watch. And this is effective B2B lead generation how? Why not link the QR Code to a web site first and then offer the video to watch? Or, link directly to the video but, at the end of the video, provide a link to the company's home page or a product page? With the execution found in this advertisement, the lead generation process stops dead in its tracks, because there is no outlet (i.e., email address to write to, phone number to call, product information to download, local sales office address to visit, no share capability, etc.).

Also, if the target audience for this advertisement is corporate CEOs does Sage, the advertiser, really believe that a CEO would spend 3:50 minutes viewing such a video? Maybe they would, but has that variable been tested?

Lastly, the QR Code triggered video might pull a better response if there was some sort of call-to-action or description associated with the code, as well as some real value and benefit to the overall interactive experience (i.e., buy the ERP product within the next 30 days and receive X in return -- an offer not given to others).

Did someone say best practices?
  
2D Bar Code Litmus Test: FAIL

7.23.2012

Less Than Stellar Use of a QR Code

Automatic Data Processing (ADP) has launched a new print advertisement which features a QR Code.


If the purpose of this campaign, which I believe it is, is to generate sales leads for the business, how does ADP plan to do this via the QR Code? Or, the question could be asked, what purpose does the QR Code serve towards the generation of sales leads? I ask these questions, because all the code links to is the desktop version of the company's website. Nothing more, nothing less.

Yes, the desktop version of the website provides lead generation mechanisms (i.e., a 1-800 phone number to call, an email address to write to and a white paper to download) but, without a mobile version of the site to work off of, the ability to make use of these mechanisms becomes burdensome for the mobile-based prospect. Regardless of channel, lead generation should not involve hurdles or barriers, but yet here they are (i.e., the need to pinch, scroll, flick, etc.) and in all their glory. The simple solution...build a mobile web site and include the same lead generation mechanisms. 

As pointed out in a previous post, the term "print to mobile technology" (i.e., 2D bar codes, digital watermarks, etc.) does not include the term, word or phrase "desktop" so, why make desktop part of the campaign? Also, where in the campaign is there any incentive for the prospect to respond, let alone engage and interact with the QR Code? Here's a hint, there is none.
 
At the end of the day, I would love to know what ADP expects from this campaign, as well as what the actual response rate is. Even if the company had objectives for this campaign something tells me they will not be met. Your guess?

2D Bar Code Litmus Test: FAIL

7.21.2012

DHL's QR Code Fails to Deliver

DHL may be expert at delivering packages around the globe, but the company is anything but that when it comes to delivering a meaningful and worthwhile QR Code (brand and service) experience. Let's take a closer look.


DHL ran this print advertisement in the recent issue of Bloomberg Businessweek and, when the reader of the advertisement scans the QR Code, they are brought to a "mobile web site." On the mobile web site is a 59-second video and three buttons, each of which reads "Recommend this site," "dhl.com" and "Deutsche Post DHL (Legal)."

First, the video. The video is not optimized for mobile and, more than that, it has relatively very little meaning and/or value to the viewer. The video does not discuss what the company does, how it may beat the competition or what the latest product/service offering may be. While there is text on the screen, it's so small it's nearly impossible to read. Strike one.

Second, the "Recommend this site" button. Question, why would the reader recommend the site? There is no site to recommend or, I should say, there is no content, or even an experience, worthy of a recommendation. Great that the company asks for a recommendation, as few do, but this is not the place do so. Strike two.

Third, the "dhl.com" button. Why should the reader of the advertisement have to divert to the desktop version of the company's website to see additional content and make use of additional functionality? If the mobile site was built out correctly, there should be no reason to fall back on the desktop version of the site. Strike three.

Fourth, the 'Deutsche Post DHL (Legal)" button. There's nothing more alluring than legal copy. If it is a matter of disclosure, etc., fine, include the copy, but this need not be so front and center. Strike four.

When all is said and done, the reader of this advertisement has been given zero incentive to move further down the purchase decision path. What can the company possibly stand by running an advertisement like this? Or, I could ask, what can the company possibly stand by including a QR Code in an advertisement like this? Nothing, that's what.  And it's a shame, because all an advertisement like this does is leave a reader with a bad taste in their mouth when it comes to scanning bar codes in the future.

Why not, via the QR Code, give consumers all of the tools and information they need, on a mobile optimized site, to make use of DHL's delivery services. For example, what about tracking a shipment, calculating shipping costs, the country's served by DHL, the various delivery services offered, where to find a local DHL office, etc., etc. Is it just me, or did DHL's marketing/creative/mobile team just phone this one in? My hunch, the latter.

While there are other QR Code related missteps with the campaign, I believe I have given DHL enough to think over and will leave it at that.

2D Bar Code Litmus Test: FAIL

7.20.2012

QR Codes and the Meaning of Like

Honora Winery, a small winery in Vermont, is running this print advertisement in local New England magazines, and featured in the advertisement is a QR Code.


When the code is scanned, the message which appears on the scan resolve page is as follows, "Like us on Facebook and tell us where you got our QR Code and we'll send you a certificate for a free tasting for 2 at one of our stores." Question, doesn't a person have to experience something before they decide whether or not they actually like it? This is the one thing I simply do not understand when it comes to likes on Facebook, but maybe it's just me. It seems as though companies ask for Facebook likes before a consumer even has a chance to experience the product, service and/or brand and, if that's the case, how meaningful, relevant, valuable is a like from this type of consumer?

Honora does a nice job offering an incentive for consumers to come and try their wines but, why not use the free tasting for two as a reward for scanning the code and then, should the reader of the advertisement go to the store and actually taste some wines, ask for the Facebook like then? Doesn't that make more sense?

What also irks me about a campaign like this (i.e., to do/offer anything in exchange for a like) is that it only speaks to people who are on Facebook. On the scan resolve page, if the reader of the advertisement wants to make good on the offer, they are instructed to touch a link that brings them to a Facebook sign-on page. But, what if the reader is not on Facebook, are they to be turned away from the offer? Are they to be considered any less of a potential customer and/or ambassador of the brand (in actuality, isn't that what companies should be striving for, brand ambassadors)? 

In my mind, if I were the owner of this or any company, I would want fans that are real fans, true fans, meaning they actually purchased and/or used my products and services. Not fans that simply like my company in order to receive a free reward. To me, that's a shallow customer relationship, one not worth having. 

Lastly, if the company wants to have a Facebook presence that's fine but, why not integrate the digital channels and have a Facebook link on their corporate site? And, going back to the use of the QR Code, if the scan resolve experience was so remarkable, which it really isn't, why not have a Facebook widget on the screen, so readers of the advertisement can immediately share that experience, the offer, the products, etc., with their network? Bottom line, not a well thought out strategy. 

2D Bar Code Litmus Test: FAIL

7.10.2012

The Print to Mobile Equation

If the term "print to mobile technology" (i.e., 2D bar codes, digital watermarks, visual search, augmented reality, etc.) was a mathematical equation, it's fairly plain to see that the word "print" makes up half of the equation and "mobile" makes up the other half. No where in the equation is the term "desktop" so, why then, do marketers continue to make use of desktop content (e.g., images, copy) and design in advertising campaigns which feature print to mobile technology?

Marketers should know better and not be so lazy. If a mobile site is needed create one. If it's a matter of cost and resources and a mobile site can't be developed and maintained then forgo the use of print to mobile technology. Simple, isn't it? Using print to mobile technology in a less than ideal way will only lead to poor brand/product user experiences and, at the end of the day, this is the last thing that any marketer and/or company wants to deal with and have to overcome.

You're welcome.

7.09.2012

The Future of QR Codes? Maybe.

Casio recently launched a new iPhone app called Picapicamera.

Instead of using black and white modules/pixels and/or other geometric designs (i.e., customized QR Codes, Microsoft Tags, SnapTags, etc.) to base a code on, Picapicamera uses an array of colored dots (red, blue, green) to act as the code.


While the amount of data to be held by the colored dots is very limited, the distance by which they can be read/scanned is supposedly further than for QR Codes. Additionally, the technology enables easy social sharing of the message or content embedded in the colored dots.

It will be interesting to see if Casio, or anyone else for that matter, develops the technology further and if companies may start to make use of it commercially. Time will tell.

 

7.03.2012

6 Reasons Why You Have No QR Code Clue

The article below was recently published on Business2Community's website and it just makes me laugh. My comments to the author, and in general, are listed after "2DBS" and are in bold. Enjoy. (Note: the author is based in Singapore and I assume English is not his first language.)

6 Reasons Why QR Code Won't Work by Jacky Tan

Recently, due to the rise of the smart phone users, many marketers are beginning to jump onto the QR code bandwagon in order to take advantage of this group of new-age consumers. Being a brand with its unique QR code makes the brand looks trendy and keeping up with the time, it seems like having a QR code is a must have for all marketers and branding managers.

2DBS: Yes, QR Codes and other print to mobile technologies have the ability to help brands appear forward-thinking and technologically savvy, but these technologies are hardly must haves for marketers and brand managers. If there is anything that is a must have these days is a mobile presence, but even here mobile may or may not make sense for each and every company and/or marketing situation.

However, in my opinion, QR code may not be that great even with today’s new age consumers due to these reasons.

1.Too Troublesome
In order to check out the QR code, one has to get a smartphone with a camera. Download a QR scanner, scan and take a picture of the QR code and then ‘VOILA!’ you can finally see the promotion and ad messages behind this code!. The question is why take the trouble to do all these in the first place.
 
2DBS: First, any smartphone on the market will have a camera. Second, with regard to the trouble of downloading an app, if apps were such a nuisance to download and make use of, why would millions of them be used each and every day? Once a reader app is downloaded it is only a matter of seconds to open the app and scan the code. The app argument is old and holds no water, next!

2.Psst…it’s a Secret
QR codes are secretive and totally lack of openness and transparency. Imagine you are going to a shop to buy some jeans. When you reach that shop, the doors are shut and you can’t see anything inside the shop as the walls are painted all black. And then you saw a message at the door that reads, “says these 4 secret words so that you can come into this shop”. Would you want to come to this ‘mystery’ shop with no idea what’s inside?

Well, QR codes works ‘secretly’. Well it does give an element of surprise, however at the same time, it also creates a cloud of doubt for your potential consumer on your brand as well. So why the mystery?

2DBS: Here is when people get the technology of QR Codes confused with the strategic use of QR Codes for marketing purposes. Sure a consumer is not going to know what's really linked to the code, but if the advertiser provides a well thought out call-to-action or incentive for scanning the code, the consumer should have a pretty good idea of what lies behind the code and why it makes sense for them to scan it. In addition, the same can be said about email marketing. With only the subject line to go on, what does a consumer really know about the contents of the email itself? Last I heard, no one really considered email marketing secretive or mysterious.

3.Many Brands Are Doing That, It’s Nothing Special
Well, when QR first started, it does aroused much curiosity among consumers especially when they want to find out how QR codes work for the first time. However, when more and more businesses and brands are doing that, consumers are beginning to feel that QR codes are just like any massive interrupting advertising messages. Hence eventually when the frenzy dies down, the QR code advertising will no longer special to the consumer anymore.

2DBS: I'm the first one to agree with Seth Godin, much of today's advertising interrupts the consumer from one end of the day to the next, but no brand is out there forcing a consumer to interact with their code. The code and its scan resolve content is there for the taking. With respect to so many brands making use of codes, the specialty has worn off. Sorry disagree here too. Of all of the advertisers in the market, I would say that the vast majority are still not using codes.

4. Creating a Difficult New Habit for Consumers
QR code creates a new kind of habit for consumers to view promotions and changes the way one looks at advertisement. The question here is, will the consumers able to be accustomed to such new habit?

In other words, the marketer need to ask “Does this habit simplify one’s life or making someone’s life more difficult?” “Does the consumer prefers to see the advertisement and ad message straightforwardly or the consumer prefer to go through the hassle of scanning, taking picture and then view the ad?”

Smartphones, unlike QR codes, is considered an easy switch for the new age consumer because of the fact that people are already used to getting information via the Internet through computers, and smart phones just make one able to access the internet and get information faster and easier even on the move. Therefore, it is an easy switch of habit with the same yet improved main purpose that is access the internet.

However, the purpose of QR code is different. It is to encourage people to view advertisement in a new, difficult and indirect way hence making it a difficult habit switch such that people need time to adapt and accept.

2DBS: Let's back this "argument" up. First, can't this be said about any new technology, disruptive or not? People needed to learn how to use a radio, a television, a personal computer, an iPod, a tablet, email, a facsimile machine, etc. Yes, QR Codes require consumers to learn something new, but again, no one is forcing them to do so. The use of a code is there simply as another form of engagement and interaction between the brand and the consumer. Will it take time for consumers to learn new "habits" with respect to scanning codes, sure, but that's when an advertiser can help (see best practices).

5. What About Smartphones Without Cameras?
QR codes work with people who have smartphones with camera. What about people who do not have smartphones or people with smart phones that does not have the camera function? These groups of people can also be your buying consumers; hence if you focus too much on QR codes branding, you might lose out some potential clients along the way.

Consumers without camera functioned smart phones may also feel that your brand is unfair towards them. Why can’t they enjoy the same benefits of your brand just because they don’t have a smart phone with camera?

2DBS: Mr. Tan, now you're really grasping at straws. Yes, there are two audiences in the marketplace: those with smartphones and those with feature phones (i.e., a non-smartphone). If an advertiser wishes to focus only on smartphone users, and alienate feature phone users, that's their pejorative. If, on the other hand, an advertiser wants to market towards both audiences while making use of a QR Code then they should offer another means by which feature phone users can access the scan resolve content. To do this, they could offer a short code. Pretty simple isn't it?
 

6. Wait a Minute, I am Trying to Scan this Code! 
People receive tons of marketing messages all day. Now, they have one more QR code to entertain. QR code is a good innovation however it creates too many points of contact between the consumer and the brand.

The less the point of contact between the consumer and the brand, the better. The best marketing or branding messages is something that one sees and immediately register that brand in their minds right away. Vice versa, when there is more point of contacts and steps to do in order to receive the marketing messages, people would simply ignore it.

Your consumer has no time to follow your instructions step by step in order to see your ad message. If this is true, you would be seeing this as an everyday phenomena that people would crowd around an ad poster in your train station trying their best to scan the QR code. It’ll never happen. Hence, don’t beat around the bush, you got to tell your consumer straight.

2DBS: Mr. Tan, it seems as though you are confusing branding and advertising. They go hand in hand, but not all of the time. If the goal is to raise pure brand awareness a company might do X. If the goal is to sell a particular product a company might do Y. If the goal is to raise brand awareness and sell product a company might do Z. My point here is that it all depends on the goals and objectives that are set for a campaign, QR Code-based or otherwise. I have heard that the more pieces in a direct mail campaign the higher the response rate. Why? Because there are more touch points to catch the interest of the consumer. I would argue the same with code-based campaigns. Displaying a code and offering scan resolve content merely provides the consumer with that many more reasons/chances to engage and interact. None of this is a zero sum game.
 

In summary, QR codes are good additional marketing tools for your brand but do not have to focus too much energy and time on it. However, you can still test it to see if it works or don’t work for your business since this is something new and trendy since everybody is doing it.
 
2DBS: After writing six reasons why QR Codes won't work, you now say they "are good additional marketing tools." Mr. Tan, if you only spent as much time truly researching the technology and how it can and should be used, you could have saved yourself, and your readers, a lot of time and effort.

7.02.2012

A Word to the Wise About QR Codes

In the June 16th issue of The Economist, an article was posted about QR Codes titled, "Square deal - After many false starts, QR codes are finally taking off." While the article does a fine job defining QR Codes and explaining how they are becoming more and more popular among advertisers, the second to last sentence in the article ("The success of a [QR Code] campaign is easy to measure by the number of scans.") just does not sit right.


If you are a reader of this blog, you will know that the success of a QR Code campaign, or any print to mobile technology-based campaign for that matter, is based on whether or not the campaign, as a whole, is able to achieve the strategic and/or tactical goals and objectives that were set for it. QR Code scan rates by themselves should not be considered as the only factor to determine success. Factors of success for a QR Code-based campaign can be the same as most any other campaign, such as the number of leads generated, number of products sold, number of requests for additional information, number of social shares, amount of time spent on certain web pages, the speed of response, the geographic location of a response, number of downloads made, number of coupons redeemed, etc., etc.

Compare a QR Code campaign to a direct mail campaign, where the code scan rate equals the the number of direct mail letters that are opened, and it's easy to see how little scan rate really means in relation to the overall success of a campaign. Consumers can open up hundreds of direct mail letters, but maybe only a dozen take any real or meaningful action. Same with codes. Hundreds of codes can be scanned (i.e., opened), but maybe only a handful of consumers really act on and respond to the message or offer being communicated.

Bottom line, QR Code scan rates are a "nice to know," but they should not be considered as the sole determinant of overall campaign success.